The PROPHETS STORY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lamentation One. |
|
| 1:12. | All you who pass by the way look and see: Is any sorrow like the sorrow that afflicts me, with which Yahweh has struck me on the day of his burning anger? |
|
Lamentation Two. |
|
| 2:15. | All who pass your way clap their hands at the sight: they whistle and shake their heads over the daughter of Jerusalem. "Was this the loveliest of all. This, the joy of the whole world?" |
|
Lamentation Three. |
|
| 3:16. | He has broken my teeth with gravel. He has given me ashes for food. My soul is shut out from peace: I have forgotten happiness. And now I say: My strength is gone, That hope which came from Yahweh. |
| 3:25. | Yahweh is good to those who trust him. to the soul that searches for him. It is good to wait in silence for Yahweh to save. It is good for a man to bear the yoke from youth onwards. |
|
Lamentation Four. |
|
| 4:6. | The crimes of the daughter of my people have outdone the sins of Sodom. 4:8. (Compared to a mummy) Now with faces darker than blackness itself They move unrecognizable through the streets. The skin is shrunken against their bones. Dry as a stick. |
|
Lamentation Five. |
|
| 5:6. | We hold out our hands to Egypt, or to Assyria, just to get enough bread. 5:21. Make us come back to you, Yahweh, and we will come back. Renew our days as in times past, unless you have utterly rejected us, in an anger that knows no limit. |
These are a few of the verses I would recall as I think of the Lamentations. However, I see something new each time I read slowly through all the book. The ideas could be applied over and over again to any nation that had deserted the path of moral integrity.
BARUCH.
False God: Goals that Turn Out Empty, Frustrating, Useless.
Baruch was a sort of secretary to Jeremiah. This book seems to be a summary of basic ideas that have been presented in earlier books.
Chapter 6 is purportedly a letter of Jeremiah to the Jews who were being led into the neo-Babylonian captivity. The basic theme is found in 6:5-6: “Be on your guard. Do not imitate the foreigners. Do not fear their gods, as you see their worshippers flocking before and behind them. Instead, say in your
hearts, ‘Master, it is you that we have to worship. For my angel is with you and your lives will be in his care’.” A refrain is repeated over and over again in 6:14,22, 28, 38, 44, 51, 56, 64, 68, 71. This refrain is “From this it is evident they are not gods. Do not be afraid of them.”
The conclusion is in 6:72: “Better then, a virtuous man who has no idols; disgrace will never come near him.” The goal: be a just person.
EZECHIEL. 593-571 B.C.
Personal Responsibility Gives the Living Spirit to a People.
PRENOTE:
In 2:1, Ezechiel was addressed as “SON OF MAN.” This title would be repeated again and again. Its purpose was to stress the distance between God and man. In Daniel 7:13, this same phrase became a description of the Messiah who was to come and would stress his mysterious greatness.
(See New Testament Application for “Son of Man” in Old Testament commentary on Daniel.)
Message of Ezechiel.
Ezechiel was an enlightening teacher and, at the same time, the starting point of a whole new type of literature. It is called “APOCALYPTIC” which means “REVELATORY.” The stress was on the revelation about the future that was yet to come, rather than on the present and its relation to the past.
The previous prophets had all been in Israel or Judah, and were trying to get the people to shape up and worship Yahweh with lives that befitted him. Now there was no Promised Land or Chosen People. The remnant was down in the Neo-Babylonian Captivity.
Ezechiel was taken with the first wave of captives in 597 B.C. When they arrived in the foreign land, the people were asking why this had happened to them. They could not see that any of this was their fault. They were sure that Yahweh would see their plight and restore them to their former glory.
Ezechiel spent his time and efforts trying to convince the exiles that this punishment was their own fault. Yahweh was displeased with them for their immoral conduct and violation of His Covenant. They would not be delivered from exile until they had repented and atoned for their sins. Because this conversion was not going to take place quickly, Ezechiel turned his attention to the future.
This was the beginning of the Apocalyptic outlook. The notion of SEER now became the principal aspect of Ezechiel's work and this would continue on to the coming of Jesus and the fulfillment.
ROLE and RESPONSIBILITY of the PROPHET. EZK: 3:16-21
This is a clear and detailed description of the role and responsibility of the prophet. Yahweh stressed that the prophet has the obligation to tell all the people, just and sinners, about their obligations. Then the responsibility of remaining upright, or converting and becoming upright, rested on the shoulders of each person. However, if the prophet failed to do his job, the failure of the people would be put at his door and he would be punished for it.
This is the clearest description of the role of prophet that has been given so far. The notion of the personal responsibility of the prophet is clearly stated.
INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY. Ezk:18:1-22.
Now this notion of the responsibility of each individual was really explained and stressed. Until this time, the emphasis was on the people of Yahweh. It is true, the individual was responsible, but the stress was on the membership in the people of Yahweh. Now, that people had been destroyed. The small remnant was all that remained. Each individual would have to answer for him/herself. They could and should help each other, but in the final analysis, the individual was responsible for his/her conduct.
In 18:21-23, Ezechiel stressed that Yahweh did not take delight in the punishment of the sinner. He was not some kind of ogre going around spying on people and hoping to catch them in some transgression so that he could denounce them. Rather, Yahweh wanted the people to lead lives that were holy and pleasing to him, and to enjoy themselves fully. If the person failed, he wanted that person to repent and be restored to favor.
Chapter 34 develops many of the details of Yahweh as shepherd of his people. He would lead them to salvation. We each must become a shepherd for others, especially the leaders.
DANIEL. 167-164 B.C.
The Son of Man Is a Glorious King.
With Daniel we come to the last of the major prophets. His name means “God is my Judge.” This was a good name for the young man because of the nature of his teachings. He was in the Greek period when wisdom or knowledge was worshipped. Daniel contrasted the wisdom that came from Yahweh with the so-called wisdom of the gods.
The Apocalyptic literature abounds in Daniel, and the reader should go back to Ezechiel and read the summary of this style again.
The actual text of Daniel is a mixture. Chapters 1:1-2:4 are written in Hebrew. Chapters 2:5-7:28 are written in Aramaic. Chapters 8-12 are written in Hebrew. Chapters 13-14 are written in Greek.
As we begin to read about the fulfillment of this whole plan of salvation, we find that Daniel had more influence than any other writer of the Old Testament.
Reference to the New Testament
It is true that Daniel was the closest in time among the prophets, but it's also true that his phrases were used most often in the actual teaching of Jesus.
First, these are the key notions in the chapters of Daniel.
Dan.1:1-20: True Wisdom.
Dan.2:1-49: True Wisdom - Kingship.
Dan.3:1-97: True Wisdom - Worship.
Dan.4:1-34: Without Wisdom = no man.
Dan.5:1-6:1:Without wisdom = no kingship.
Dan.6:2-29: Fidelity of God: delivers from death.
Dan.7:1-28: Chaos - Ancient of Days - Son of Man.
Dan.8:1-27: Persia and Greece.
Dan.9:1-27: Seventy weeks.
Dan.10-12: Michael, one of leading princes.
Dan.13:1-64: Just woman saved.
Dan.14:1-42: Idols destroyed.
Daniel 1:1-21. Food for the Hebrews.
This is the story of the four Hebrew boys who were brought into the service of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. The neo-Babylonians were out to establish a world empire. As the nations were conquered, the king ordered his chief servant to pick out some of the more intelligent boys for his special service. Four Hebrew boys were selected when Judah was conquered, and Daniel was one of the four. He was noted for his ability to speak, to interpret dreams, and to speak wisely. The king was pleased and ordered that the boys be fed from the royal table.
Daniel was opposed to this source for his food since all of it was first offered to the idols. Daniel asked the man in charge to give them a vegetarian diet. The servant was scared but agreed to the ten day test that Daniel suggested. At the end of the ten days, Daniel and his three companions looked better than any of the other young men. So Daniel won this point on the food, and his wisdom far outshone anything that the other young men could offer.
Nebuchadnezzar Dreams. Daniel:2:1-49.
The people of these times and places attached a great importance to dreams and their meaning in daily life. Nebuchadnezzar had a series of dreams and he was really upset.
He called in all of his interpreters and told them they must first tell him the dream and then what it means. The interpreters were upset. No king had ever made such a request before. But the king was adamant. He was sure that if they could tell him the dream first, then their interpretation would be true. The interpreters said this was impossible and the king got angry and decreed their deaths.
Daniel found out about this decree, and he and his three companions offered special prayers to Yahweh for help. Then Daniel asked to be taken to the king. He stressed that his knowledge came from Yahweh and then he told the king the dream.
The dream: There was a statue of great brightness and terrifying to behold. The head was of gold, the chest and arms were of silver, the torso was bronze, the legs of iron, and the feet were part iron and part ceramic. While the king was watching, a stone suddenly broke loose by its own power and hit the statue on the feet and shattered them. Then the whole statue crashed to the ground, broke into a fine dust - like chaff - and the wind blew it all away. Then this stone grew into a mountain that filled the whole earth.
Now the meaning: King Nebuchadnezzar was the head of gold. The other parts of the statue were the various kings and kingdoms that would succeed him. Then would come the kingdom set up by the God of heaven. This kingdom would crush and remove all other kingdoms and fill the whole earth.
King Nebuchadnezzar was overcome with Daniel. He commanded that Daniel be put in charge of all his interpreters and wise men and gave him loads of presents.
The Furnace of Fire. Daniel 3:1-100.
Then the king had a golden statue made and this was to be carried around to be worshipped. Anyone who did not bow down before the statue would be burned to death.
Three friends of Daniel refused to bow before the statue. They were reported to the king. He had a special furnace heated, and the three young men were tossed into the fire. The flames were so hot that they consumed the men who were putting the three Hebrews in the fire.
When they were in the furnace, everyone could see them walking around and enjoying themselves. However, they did notice that there was a fourth person with them. This was the angel of Yahweh and he kept it nice and cool in the center of the fire. They sang a beautiful song in perfect meter and rhythm while in the furnace.
The king ordered them released. They are not to be bothered again.
The King Goes Mad. Daniel 4:1-34.
The king had another dream. He called Daniel for the interpretation. There was a tree in the middle of the world. It began to grow until it reached the sky. All animals found shelter under it and all creatures found food on it. Then a holy one came down from heaven and had the tree cut down. Only a stump remained and that was bound with hoops of iron and bronze. Then the king went out and lived like an animal.
Daniel was almost afraid to tell the king what his dream meant. The tree was his kingdom. This kingdom was worldwide. But Yahweh would cut him down and the King would go mad and be thrown out of human society to live with the animals. However he would come back and the stump, which was the remnant of his kingdom, would be there for him to pick up again.
The interpretation of Daniel was carried out. The king of Babylon went mad and was thrown out of human society. He recovered, and he was accepted again into his position as king.
The Handwriting on the Wall. Daniel 5.
The King was having a huge banquet. There was a bit of inaccuracy in the names in the story. The king was called Belshazzar here. The point of the story is the same.
After the guests and the king had drunk alcohol, suddenly a hand appeared and began to write on the wall. The interpreters were called in and none of them could tell what it means. Then Daniel was called and he read the words and told their meaning.
The words were: “Mene, Mene, Tekel, and Parsin.” The meaning was: “God has taken your measure as king. You have been weighed on the scale and come up short. Your kingdom shall be divided and given to the Persians.”
That night, Belshazzar is murdered and Darius the Mede takes over.
Daniel in the Lions’ Den! Daniel 6:1-28.
Daniel was becoming too powerful and popular to suit the other servants and interpreters of the royal court. They rigged up a document that stated that anyone who prayed to any God, other than the king, for the next thirty days would be thrown in the lions’ den. The king signed the document. The enemies of Daniel layed in wait.
Daniel heard of the document, but continued his habit of praying to Yahweh, facing Jerusalem. All could see him. He was reported to the king and was thrown into the lions’ den. The king told Daniel that Yahweh would have to save him.
The next morning, the king hurried to the pit. He called to Daniel and Daniel answered in a cheery voice. The king was overcome with joy. Then the accusers and their families were tossed in and the lions devoured them on the fly.
As we continue with the Book of Daniel, we begin the section known as Daniel’s Vision chapters 7-12. Some look on this section as several dreams or visions. Others maintain it is one vision or dream with several interpretations. What you hold on this issue does not make a lot of difference. The important part is the interpretation given and its use in the New Testament literature. especially in the Gospels.
Daniel 7:1-28.
“SON OF MAN” Dan.7:7-13.
There was a terrible storm and out of the waters came the four great beasts. A lion with wings of an eagle; a bear with three ribs in his mouth; a leopard with four wings like those of a bird and four heads; a fourth terrifying beast with large iron teeth and ten horns. The description of this last beast is quite detailed.
Then came the one like a “Son of Man.” He came up to the Ancient of the Days and received supreme power, glory and kingship over all nations. This power would last forever.
New Testament use of term “Son of Man”:
The title "Son of Man" was used by Jesus and the first Christians as the sole designation for him. This was a Daniel phrase and even in Daniel, the prophet was not quite sure what it means.
Jesus often showed an anxiety over his personal identity. He asked the apostles on several occasions, “Who do people think I am?” In fact, the final scene in the Garden of Olives was a struggle over this very question. Jesus almost got to the point of saying “It’s too much!” And then he submitted to the plan, whatever it was. And in his obedience to the plan of God, Jesus became the “Son of Man.”
Here are the passages from the four gospels where the phrase is used. It is highly beneficial to look up each reference.
MARK: 2:10,28; 8:31,38; 9:12,31; 10:33,45; 13:26; 14:21,41,62.
LUKE: 5:24; 6:5,22; 7:34; 9:22,26,36,44,58; 10:22;
11:30; 12:8,10,40; 17:22,30; 18:8,31,38; 19:10;
21:27,36; 22:22,48,67; 23:34,46; 24:7.
MATTHEW: 8:20; 9:6; 10:23; 11:19; 12:8,32,40;
3:38,41; 16:13,27,28; 17:9,22; 19:28; 20:18,28;
24:27,30,36,37,39,40,44; 25:31; 26:24,46,64.
JOHN: 1:29,51; 3:13,14,17,18; 5:18,27; 6:27,40,53,62; 8:25;
9:35; 12:23,35; 13:3,31; 17:1.
Gabriel Interprets. Daniel 8:1-27.
This vision was about a ram and a he-goat. The he-goat had one large horn in the center of his forehead. He attacked the ram and crushed it. At the height of his victory, the one horn snapped and four great horns sprouted in its place. Then a small horn sprang from one of these four and grew into a mighty horn. It was all powerful and totally destructive. It even attacked God and the people of God. It abolished the perpetual sacrifice and destroyed the temple. This was to take place in 2300 (or 1150) days. This part is quite obscure. The whole picture seems to refer to Medes and Persians, Alexander and the Greeks, and Antiochus IV, the Terrible.
The interpretation sent Daniel to bed sick for several days. There is also the prophecy of the 72 weeks. The picture was definitely a threatening description of what was to take place in that 2nd century B.C. Besides the notion of the Son of Man we also have the introduction of Gabriel as the official interpreter who came from God.
New Testament reference:
Gabriel would be the messenger who approached Zachary, the father of John Baptist; and Mary, the Mother of Jesus; and Joseph, her husband. There is no doubt that the first Christians and the gospel writers saw a connection between this writing of Daniel and the beginnings of the life of Jesus.
DANIEL. Chapters 13-14.
These last two stories or chapters are not in the Hebrew text of Daniel. They are only in Greek. However, manuscript evidence tells us that they definitely belong to the writing called Daniel.
SUSANNA. Chapter 13
This was a great story of a young wife falsely accused of a crime she did not commit. However, the accusers were elders and judges and therefore their word would supercede hers in the courts. She was condemned to die.
At this juncture, a young boy named Daniel, spoke out boldly, “I am innocent of the blood of this woman.” This statement really brought the crowd up short and they asked Daniel what he meant.
He had them gather in session again. He questioned the elders separately. He asked what kind of tree they saw Susanna lying under, sinning with this young man. They had no opportunity to harmonize their answers and so they gave different answers. The Law said any one lie in the evidence destroyed its credibility.
Susanna was freed. Her good name was restored and the shameful elders were put to death. Daniel and his mental acumen were really appreciated by all.
BEL and THE DRAGON. Chapter 14.
This chapter contains two excellent stories of the triumph of good over evil. They are concerned with idols, idolatrous worship, and the deceit of the priests of these idols.
The king was Cyrus, king of Persia. Daniel was a close friend. There was an idol, called Bel. Every day, Bel was given 12 bushels of the best flour, forty sheep, and six measures of wine. Bel, supposedly, consumed it all.
One day, Cyrus asked Daniel why he did not worship Bel with everyone else. Daniel said Bel was just a statue, clay inside and bronze outside. This statue had never eaten anything in his life.
Cyrus was upset and said that if Daniel could not prove his claims, he would die. The priests were glad to prove Daniel wrong. The King had all the food put in front of the statue. Then everyone went out and the king locked the door and sealed it with his own royal seal.
The priests had a secret door right under the table. Daniel had known or suspected this and, with the knowledge of the king, he took special precautions. He spread a very fine ash dust on the floor.
The next day, Cyrus threw the door open with a flourish and all the food was gone. The King was all ready to gloat and Daniel says, “Wait a minute! What are all these footprints doing here?” The king saw them. They led right to the secret door and directly back to the priests’ quarters. So Cyrus had the statue pulverized and the priests put to death.
Then there was this Dragon. The King said to Daniel, “You cannot say this dragon is not alive.”
Daniel said, “I’ll kill this dragon without a sword or stick.” Then he made a special concoction, rolled it into balls, and fed it to the dragon. The dragon swallowed these tar-balls and burst wide open.
King Cyrus was very happy with Daniel but the people were not. They felt the King had been duped by Daniel and they gave the King an alternative. Either hand Daniel over to them, or the King and his family would suffer the consequences. The King was on the spot and he turned Daniel over.
There was a lions’ den. The seven inhabitants were accustomed to devour two human bodies and two sheep, each day. Now they were denied food and Daniel was put in their midst.
While this scene was developing in Persia, a prophet named Habakkuk, had been making dinner for some field hands in Judea. An angel of Yahweh appeared and told him to take the lunch to Daniel, in prison, in Babylon. The prophet objected. He did not know of Daniel and did not have the slightest idea where this prison was. So the angel took Habakkuk by the hair of his head and transported him to Daniel in the lions’ den. Daniel thanked the Lord for his dinner.
On the seventh day, King Cyrus came to mourn Daniel. But there was Daniel, hale and hearty, in the midst of his “kittens.” The enemies were quickly rounded up and the lions made a quick meal of them.
Concluding Comment on Literary Form of Daniel.
We still do not understand exactly how to interpret this Apocalyptic literature in Daniel. There is no doubt that the writer intended to present his ideas in a mysterious tone. His intent seems primarily to arouse a holy anxiety or fear which makes the reader more alert to his/her own actions.
MINOR PROPHETS.
Now we continue the “Prophet Story” with the twelve minor prophets. As I said, the distinction between major and minor is not so much quality as quantity of teaching. For the most part, the minor prophets would all be classified as “nebi’im,” or “moral advisers.” This does not mean they were accepted. In fact, some of them were definitely threatened and rejected. I’ll follow the time line again and this will give us the historical background for each of these preachers.
AMOS. 783-743 B.C.
The Worst Kind of Famine - No Words of Wisdom!
Amos, to say the least, was a preacher who knew he would not be liked and did not care. He had a message which his conscience impelled him to preach. Then he would go home to his work. He stressed that he was not an official teacher or preacher.
We are told that Amos was a shepherd taking care of his flocks. He lived in the fields most of the time, and he heard how the leaders and the upper class of society failed against the Law of Yahweh. This was especially true of the practice of the fertility cults by the members of the chosen people.
His general message was that Yahweh had really put up with the failures of the people long enough. He had warned them. He had tried to lead them back. Now he was going to let their enemies take over.
His approach to the women of Jewish society was really insulting. He called them the “cows of Bashan”(4:1). Bashan was an area across the Jordan that was famous for its fat cattle. Amos was quite graphic in his description of what would happen to these pampered women when the enemy took over the cities.
In 8:11, Amos stressed that the worst famine possible would strike them. There would be a “FAMINE FOR THE WORD OF YAHWEH.” The people would finally realize the dire destruction that was taking place. They would want consolation, strength and guidance. But Yahweh would be far from them.
In chapter 7, Amos was invited to leave the country. They told him his speech was crude and he did not deserve to live in educated society. Amos agreed. He was not a professional teacher. He felt this inner urgency to tell the people what was going to happen. He did not expect them to listen to him and correct their lives. However, he had to respond to the promptings of Yahweh. He would finish his message and then he would go back to the sheep. At least the flocks would follow him to healthful pasture.
The prophecy ended on a hopeful note. In time, Yahweh would be faithful to himself and he would establish his people as promised. However, the present sinful generations would not share in the fulfillment.
HOSEA. 734-732 B.C.
Love Must Prove Itself in Action.
Because Amos and Hosea were contemporaries, there is a tendency to compare them. Two men more opposite in temperament and style hardly existed. Amos was blunt, almost crude in his language at times, and seemingly unmoved by any criticism. He had a sense of a job that needed to be done and he was going to do it.
Hosea is presented to us as a very tender-hearted person. He had the same threatening message to give because of the failure of the people against Yahweh. Yet it pained him to have to speak out with such dire threats. He really cringed at the criticisms that were sent his way.
In his presentation, Hosea developed the image of Yahweh as husband and Israel as wife. Yahweh was always faithful but Israel was called from sinfulness to serve Yahweh and constantly fell back into her old ways. The imagery was literally true in that their principal failures were connected with the practice of the fertility cults.
In chapter 4, Hosea explicitly addressed the priests. He stressed that their failures had led to the downfall of the whole people. They were supposed to be guides and leaders, and they had used this power and authority to lead the people into sin and infidelity.
Hosea stressed that Yahweh wanted obedience and lives of justice or holiness rather than burnt-offerings and libations. In 6:5-6, these ideas are stated explicitly: “This love of yours is like a morning cloud, like the dew that quickly disappears... what I want is love, not sacrifices; knowledge of God, not holocausts.”
MICAH. 721. B.C.
Repent - Restore - Be Forgiven - Live Again.
Micah was a Judean from Moresheth, west of Hebron. He worked as prophet under kings Joatham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah. This means that he was prior to the fall of Samaria in 722 B.C. He was a contemporary of Hosea and Isaiah. His background was peasant and therefore he had much the same attitude toward society as Amos: He was suspicious of city life. His expression was down-to-earth and might even be dubbed crude at times.
We know nothing of his particular life except that we can fit it into the picture of the times just before the fall of Samaria in 722 B.C. He was opposed to the moneyed capitalists, the usurers, the swindling tradesmen, families that were fighting constantly, greedy priests and prophets, tyrants and judges always ready to pick up a bribe.
Micah’s formula for the “good life” is “to act in a just manner, to have tender love, and to walk humbly with your God.” (Mic 6:8) That is a good summary of what all the prophets were asking of the people if they want to be pleasing to Yahweh. In fact, these qualities make a good foundation for all society at all times.
The special place for Bethlehem was brought out by Micah and would be his claim to lasting fame in the Gospels. “And you, Bethlehem, Ephratha, small among the clans of Juda, out of you will be born for me the one who is to rule over Israel; his origins go back to the days of old.” (see also Gospels of Matthew 2:6 and John 7:42).
ZEPHANIAH. 640-609.B.C.
The Day of the Lord - A Day of Wrath and Punishment.
The introductory lines of this short booklet say that the prophet worked during the reign of Josiah. This dates him as 640-609 B.C. His attack on foreign manners, the worship of false gods, the rebuke of the court officials, and his silence about the king would all indicate a period before the religious reform of Josiah. Thus he would have been working about 640-630 B.C., just before Jeremiah.
Part of the territory has been seized by Sennacherib. They had come under Assyrian rule, and the lawless reigns of Manasseh and Amon favored religious disorder. Now Assyria was weakening and there was some hope of restoration.
The people had been falsely keyed up over the approach of this day. They expected Yahweh to come suddenly in a blaze of power and glory and pick them out of the hole into which they had crawled by their immoral lives.
Zephaniah put a whole new picture before them. He described the “Day of Yahweh.” The Day of Yahweh was coming but it would be a day of wrath, distress, agony, ruin, devastation, darkness and gloom. There would be a trumpet blast but it would be the battle cry of the enemy.
In Zephaniah 1:3, the prophet described the terrible fate that was in store for the people of Juda in a few short years - the destruction of Jerusalem. We read the somber thoughts of this prophet at the time of overthrow of the people of God.
New Testament reference:
The pessimistic outlook gave rise to the liturgical song used in the Requiem Mass called the “Dies Irae.” The day of Yahweh as a day of wrath was applied to the death of every Christian and to every person in the world. This approach was clearly not the attitude of Jesus in the gospels. However, it has put an abnormal fear in the thought or approach of death and the message of the gospels is ignored.
Matthew 13:41 is a reference to Zephaniah 1:3, where the prophet was describing the terrible fate that was in store for the people of Juda in a few short years. Jesus was explaining the parable of the wheat and the weeds. The parable described the end of the world when the wicked, like the weeds, would be gathered into a pile and burned. The good people, like the wheat, would be gathered into the presence of God to be happy forever.
NAHUM. 612 B.C.
The Enemy Falls to Rise No More.
Nahum is another very short writing with apparently only one purpose: the prophet was intent on showing the terrible destruction that was to come to Niniveh because of its opposition and harm to the people of Yahweh. The prophet did not praise the people of Yahweh but he did condemn the people of Niniveh who were worse.
Nahum would not have been a popular preacher with either group. He did not really say anything flattering about either party. He did stress what the people of Yahweh were supposed to be and how great they could become. But he did not praise them for having attained any of these heights.
Nahum’s stressed the kind of destruction that Niniveh faces. The people of Judah probably took this as some kind of reprieve for themselves but Nahum in no way said it or even hinted at it.
HABAKKUK. 597 B.C.
A Bad Person Is Punished - But the Punisher Is Worse.
Habakkuk is a short anomaly for those times. The prophet questioned Yahweh in the same way that Job will question him later on. At first, he seemed almost too forward or brazen in his questioning. However, by this literary technique, the prophet stressed the justice and the mercy of Yahweh. Yahweh was always ready to forgive and to help but the first step had to be taken by the seeker. Yahweh’s gifts were not handouts. They must be earned or deserved.
There are five warnings, “Woes” directed to the oppressors.
WOE to the people who amass wealth that belongs to someone else.
WOE to the people who use others for their own selfish purposes.
WOE to people who found a fortune or fame on the blood of others through cruelty and violence.
WOE to those who are a source of scandal to others by their words or conduct.
WOE to the idolaters who worship the things that man has made from wood and stone.
Habakkuk ended on a note of hope with a beautiful liturgical song. The prophet described the great power and might which Yahweh had shown in the past. The description was such that it almost made a person fear and tremble. Then it ended in the calm expectation of joy and peace that would come from Yahweh for the people who obeyed his Law.
Keep in mind that the first siege of Jerusalem in 597 B.C. was taking place at the time of this writing or preaching. The terrible destruction that was to culminate a few years later was already under way. People who listened to the prophets and the Law of Yahweh would get great consolation even in the midst of their danger.
New Testament reference:
The five-fold "Woe" to the oppressors would be used by Jesus in his condemnation of the Jewish leaders of his times.
HAGGAI: 520-515 B.C.
New Glory Will Come to this Temple.
We are now at the beginning of the post-exilic times. The remnant of Jerusalem had been hauled down to Babylon in 587 B.C. They had been a truly downcast people because all their glory was gone and they were a mere handful of slaves once again. They had started by blaming others and then had to face their own failures.
In 538 B.C., Cyrus and the Persians took over the neo-Babylonian empire. Cyrus was convinced that it was foolish to keep all these captured people in one spot as slaves. There was not enough work for them to do and they had to be fed if any profit would come. So Cyrus decided to send them to their home countries. They would go as subject people but they could live and work in their own lands.
This remnant was a rather sad lot. Some of them had intermarried with the pagans. They were neither Jew nor pagan. Many of them did not want to leave their wives and children and go back to a questionable future. Others wanted to go but they wanted to take their pagan families with them.
Finally, a group of the exiles left for Jerusalem. It was a long and difficult journey. They were discouraged. Then they arrived in Jerusalem. Most of these people had not been here before. They were born in captivity or they were very young when they left Jerusalem. They had heard all the “glowing” accounts of the City of David, the Temple of Yahweh, and the great feasts. They were expecting to see all this glory at journey’s end. Instead they walked into a heap of rubble. Nothing had been done to restore the city or the Temple since the destruction in 587. That was more than a half century ago.
In 520 B.C., Haggai rose up to set these people in motion. They would never become the people of Yahweh unless they revived their hope and began to rebuild the city and the Temple. The Temple was necessary if they were going to restore a strong religious life expressed in a living liturgy.
Haggai’s prophecy could in no way be called even a booklet. It is a mere two pages and its whole burden was to get the people moving to rebuild the Temple. As they started, many of the people had visions of glory in mind. As they worked, this glory became a reality of unceasing and unrequited toll. Haggai spent his whole time urging them to move. Even though their final result would not be as great as the former structure, it would become the House of the Lord.
ZECHARIAH. 520-515 B.C.
Your King Comes - Glorious - Victorious - on a Donkey!
Zechariah was a contemporary of Haggai and had much the same purpose in life as did Haggai. The prophecy is divided into two distinct parts: chapters 1-8 and 9-14. There is no doubt about the authenticity and authorship of this first section. However, the second section refers to a much later time and could hardly have been put in its final form until after the rule of Alexander.
One theory, which I like, is that the first part of the writing was already in existence. Then later teachers from the time of the Greeks attached the second part to this earlier work.
Zechariah was talking about ideas and events of his time. Chapter 7 is a brief survey of the history of the chosen people. Chapter 8 is a look forward as to what is to come.
Chapter 9:9 reads, “Rejoice heart and soul, Daughter of Sion! Shout with gladness, daughter of Jerusalem! For behold, your King comes to you, victorious and triumphant, lowly and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.”
Chapter 12:10 reads “Over the House of David and over the citizens of Jerusalem I will pour out a SPIRIT of kindness and prayer. They will look on the one whom they have pierced. They will mourn for him as an only son, and weep for him as people weep for a first-born child.”
New Testament reference:
These passages describe the triumphant entry of Jesus into Jerusalem at the beginning of his passion, death, and resurrection. Jesus would give the Holy Spirit after he was gone.
Again, it is very important to mention that the prophet in these times did not necessarily think or know about Jesus and the fulfillment. As history unfolded, Jesus and his followers saw how they were putting the ideas into effect.
MALACHI. 445 B.C.
Measure a Messenger by His Message.
The name of this short writing is interesting. As stated here, it means “my messenger.” If it is spelled, “Malachiah,” it means “messenger of Yahweh.” The point that was being stressed in either spelling was that there was a special message at hand.
There are two basic messages or themes in the writing. The prophet stressed the failures of the priests and people in their religious duties (1:6-2:9, 3:6-12). Then he talked of the scandals in the mixed marriages and divorces (2:10-16).
The very end of the book talked about the return of Elijah before the day of fulfillment comes.
New Testament reference:
The return of Elijah had become an important and popular notion in the time of Jesus. He gave it a completely new interpretation by saying that John the Baptist was the return of Elijah. The prophecy meant a person with Elijah’s spirit would come. The Baptist certainly qualified.
OBADIAH. ??- 425 B.C.
The Life of Crime Destroys the Criminal.
Obadiah is a short writing -- 21 verses in all. Because of its shortness, it is difficult to place the work with any accuracy. It seems to be a call for the punishment of Edom for all the harm these descendants of Esau had done to the Israelites.
It is definitely an appeal for national vengeance. It is also a tribute to the exacting justice of Yahweh. It clearly fits into one aspect of the prophetic movement, and was considered important enough to keep in the sacred collection.
JOEL, 400 B.C.; 115-50 B.C.
Youth Supplies Enthusiasm - Age Offers Experience.
The prophecy of Joel comes in two parts. The first dates about 400 B.C. It points out that there is no king, public worship is all-important, and earlier prophets are cited. The second part is about the coming of the Spirit of Yahweh on all people in the future.
We also meet the Valley of Jehoshaphat: the valley in which Yahweh would pass judgment on all peoples. Joel talked about this valley in reference to the restoration of the Chosen People.
Joel stressed that the “old people will dream dreams and the young people will see visions.” This is in perfect keeping with the psychology of people. Older people tend to look back and draw lessons or conclusions from their past experience. Young people have to look forward and think about what is still to come because their lives lie in the future.
All the natural process is enhanced by the “spirit” or “breath” of Yahweh.
JONAH. 450 B.C.
Sincere Repentance Is Always Accepted.
The writing of Jonah is one of the best known in works of art and sculpture. Jonah received a call from Yahweh that he was to rise and go to Ninive and tell the people that they were going to be annihilated because of their sinful ways. Jonah knew this would be a very difficult mission.
He went down to the docks and took passage on a ship going in the opposite direction. While he was at sea a terrible storm arose and the sailors were afraid for their lives. They were all praying to their gods and they saw Jonah sleeping comfortably in his bunk.
He told them what had happened and he was the one to be punished. So they threw Jonah overboard in the raging sea. The storm subsided and a large fish came up and swallowed Jonah. Then, as the fish swam back to the home shore, Yahweh touched its mouth and the fish burped Jonah on the beach that he had left.
A second time, Yahweh told Jonah to get moving to Niniveh. The Ninivites listened to Jonah, saw the wisdom of his words, and they repented and were forgiven.
This did not please Jonah - at all. He complained bitterly to Yahweh. He said he knew that Yahweh was an all merciful God. If people repented, they would be forgiven and totally restored. Jonah did not like this conduct because he figured the people would laugh at him.
Yahweh stressed that he was not a God of vengeance, but a God of mercy and love.